Sensor types
Automotive gauge sensors: methods, pros and cons
There are many ways to measure thickness, but a car needs one thing — accuracy on a steel body and aluminum panels. Let’s see how each sensor type works and which one CARSYS chooses.
Method comparison
Every measurement method in one table
Tap a method to jump to its detailed description. The CARSYS methods are highlighted.
| Method | Measures | Range | Accuracy | Robustness | In cars | CARSYS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasonic | Product thickness | Wide | High | High | No | — |
| Phase eddy-current | Thin galvanic coatings | Medium | High | High | No | — |
| Parametric eddy-current | Dielectric on non-ferrous | Wide | High on non-ferrous, low on ferrous | Surface-dependent | Non-ferrous | Yes |
| Parametric magneto-induction | Coatings on steel | Wide | High | Medium | Rarely | — |
| Differential magneto-induction | Coatings on steel | Wide | High | High | Yes | Yes |
| Hall-effect sensor | Coatings on steel | Wide | Good linearity | Low (temp, Earth field) | Sometimes | — |
Sensors in order
How each method works
Ultrasonic
Measures the thickness of the part itself (wall, metal), not the coating. Not suitable for paintwork.
Pros
- Measures solid-material thickness
Cons
- Cannot measure thin coatings
Read more — technical detail
The sensor emits an ultrasonic pulse that travels through the material, reflects off the far side and returns; the thickness is derived from the return time. The method measures the thickness of the part itself, not the thin paint layer on it, so it isn’t used in automotive thickness gauges.
Phase eddy-current
Accurately measures thin galvanic coatings (zinc, nickel, chrome) on metal. Not justified for cars: expensive and narrow range.
Pros
- High accuracy on thin layers
- Great for galvanic coatings
Cons
- Expensive
- Narrow range
Read more — technical detail
The method is well suited to accurately measuring thin galvanic coatings — zinc, nickel, chrome plating and the like — in a range from a few microns to about 150 µm. For automotive thickness gauges it isn’t justified because of its cost and small range.
Parametric eddy-current
Good for paint and clear-coat on non-ferrous metals. Low accuracy on steel. CARSYS uses it on non-ferrous metals and to detect zinc and magnetic filler.
Pros
- Accurate on non-ferrous metals
- Helps detect zinc and filler
Cons
- On steel ±50–100 µm
- Depends on roughness and metal grade
Read more — technical detail
Well suited to measuring dielectric coatings (paint, clear-coat, primer, filler) over a non-ferrous substrate. It can be used on steel too, but accuracy is low and strongly depends on surface roughness and metal grade — realistically ±50–100 µm. That’s why on steel it’s only used by the cheapest gauges (priced under $40). The transducer frequency sets how deep the currents penetrate the metal. Combined with other methods, this type can work out magnetic filler and zinc. CARSYS gauges use it for measurement on non-ferrous metals and for detecting zinc and magnetic filler — together with other methods and advanced algorithms that substantially improve it.
Parametric magneto-induction
Measures non-magnetic coatings on steel with good linearity and range, but is weakly protected against temperature and interference. A bulky coil makes a combined sensor hard — these are usually industrial gauges with a remote probe.
Pros
- Good linearity
- Wide range
Cons
- Weak protection from temperature and interference
- Bulky coil — hard to combine
Read more — technical detail
Works by the change in magnetic induction in the sensor as metal approaches. It measures the thickness of coatings (non-magnetic dielectric and conductive) on steel well, with adequate linearity and a good measurement range. The downsides are relatively low protection from electromagnetic interference and temperature, and a large coil that makes a combined sensor difficult to build. Such sensors usually equip industrial gauges with a remote probe; in automotive devices they’re generally not used.
Differential magneto-induction
Two coils: one measures, the other compares. The sensor auto-adjusts to conditions, protecting against temperature and interference. High sensitivity, independent of the Earth’s field direction. And most importantly, the accuracy that matters — exactly what a car needs. Used in CARSYS gauges.
Pros
- Temperature stability and interference protection
- High sensitivity at low thickness
- Ignores the Earth’s field direction
Cons
- Strong nonlinearity — corrected by algorithms
Read more — technical detail
The principle is similar to parametric magneto-induction, but the sensor has two measuring coils, which raises accuracy and sensitivity. The first coil measures the thickness, the second is used for comparison and provides automatic adjustment to operating conditions, shielding against electromagnetic interference and magnetic fields. The sensor has good temperature stability and very high sensitivity, especially at small thickness, and doesn’t react to the direction of the Earth’s magnetic field (up-down, north-south). The downside is strong nonlinearity, but signal processing and advanced algorithms make the linearity of gauges on this sensor good. In automotive gauges, accuracy is what matters — and this is exactly the sensor type used in CARSYS gauges.
Hall-effect sensor
A small sensor made of a magnet and a Hall element, with good linearity. But strong temperature drift, the magnet weakens over time, and the sensor acts like a compass — reacting to the Earth’s field. Tell-tale sign: metal sticks to the gauge and readings change when you rotate it.
Pros
- Small size
- Good linearity
Cons
- Strong temperature drift
- Reacts to the Earth’s field like a compass
- The magnet weakens over time
Reading at 3000 µm
3000µm
Because of the Earth’s magnetic field, a Hall-effect reading at large thickness drifts noticeably when the gauge is flipped — by 80–100 µm on average.
Read more — technical detail
The sensor consists of a permanent magnet and a Hall element: as metal approaches, the magnetic field strengthens in proportion to the distance to the metal. The pros are small size and good linearity. The cons are strong temperature dependence of both the Hall element and the magnet, and the magnet can weaken over time. The Earth’s magnetic field has a strong influence: the sensor essentially works like a compass, adding to the reading toward north and subtracting toward south; in mid-latitudes this is more noticeable when measuring vertically or horizontally. Such sensors were once rarely used in gauges because of these downsides, but manufacturers have recently learned to handle the temperature drift and such devices have appeared. Spotting one is easy: metal and iron shavings stick to it, and readings change with orientation (north — south — up — down), especially at large thickness.
Why CARSYS sensors are the best
A combination of methods, not a compromise
CARSYS doesn’t rely on a single sensor and uses a combination of methods. The differential magneto-induction method delivers the accuracy that matters over steel. The parametric eddy-current method adds measurement on non-ferrous metals and detection of zinc and magnetic filler. Advanced algorithms tie the methods together, improving accuracy, and correct nonlinearity. The result is a gauge that’s accurate, stable and honest — with no thermal drift, “compass” and no reading adjustment.
What reading adjustment isKnowledge base
Read next
Material that carries the topic on: how to check a body, what the gauge does and which one to choose.
Choose a gauge with the right sensor
CARSYS gauges are built on a differential magneto-induction sensor and smart algorithms. Pick a model, or learn more about the measurement technology.